Home » Developer Trust In AI Tools Is Falling, Survey Finds

Developer Trust In AI Tools Is Falling, Survey Finds

While the use of AI development tools continues to grow, developers’ trust in the accuracy and reliability of those tools is actively declining. According to the results of the 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, which gathered insights from over 49,000 developers worldwide, the developer ecosystem is navigating a complex relationship with AI. The findings reveal a significant paradox: while more developers are incorporating AI into their workflows, their confidence in the output is falling, leading to widespread frustration and a renewed emphasis on human-verified knowledge.

The growing frustration with ‘almost-right’ AI

The survey data shows a clear divergence between the adoption of AI tools and the trust developers place in them. While 80% of developers now report using AI tools in their development process, trust in the accuracy of these tools has fallen from 40% in previous years to just 29% this year. Similarly, positive favorability toward AI has decreased from 72% to 60% year-over-year. The primary cause of this growing skepticism appears to be the practical challenge of working with imperfect AI-generated code.

The number-one frustration, cited by 45% of respondents, is dealing with “AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite”. This issue often makes debugging more difficult and time-consuming. In fact, 66% of developers state that they are spending more time fixing this “almost-right” code. This inefficiency and lack of reliability means that when the stakes are high, developers still turn to people. An overwhelming 75% of developers said they would ask another person for help when they do not trust an AI-generated answer.

The survey also indicates that the “AI agent revolution” has not yet arrived in professional workflows. While 52% of developers say agents have affected how they complete their work, the primary benefit remains personal productivity, with 69% agreeing they have seen an increase. However, the concept of “vibe coding”—generating entire applications from prompts—is not a common professional practice, with nearly 72% stating it is not part of their work. This reality aligns with job security perceptions; 64% of developers do not see AI as a threat to their jobs, though this is a slight decrease in confidence from 68% in the previous year.

Community and career satisfaction in the AI era

In an environment saturated with AI-generated answers, the need for human connection and verified knowledge has become more apparent. The survey found that developers rely on a portfolio of community resources, with Stack Overflow (84%), GitHub (67%), and YouTube (61%) leading the pack. The top-ranked activity for developers visiting Stack Overflow is reading comments, which shows a deep interest in human-to-human context. The platform is also taking on an emerging role as a source of truth for AI-related problems, with about 35% of developers reporting that some of their visits are the result of an AI issue.

The influence of AI is also visible in technology trends. Programming languages known to be compatible with AI development are growing in popularity, including Python (usage up 7 percentage points), Rust, and Go (both up 2 percentage points). When it comes to Large Language Models, OpenAI’s chat models are the most used at 81%, while Anthropic’s Claude models see higher usage among professional developers (45%) compared to those learning to code (30%).

Regarding career satisfaction, the survey reveals a workforce that is largely staying in place but is not necessarily content. A combined 75% of developers in a role describe themselves as “complacent” or “not happy at work,” although overall happiness did see a slight increase from 20% last year to 24% this year. The top drivers of job satisfaction were identified as “autonomy and trust,” “competitive pay,” and “solving real-world problems.” Notably, when asked what makes them endorse a new technology, developers ranked “AI integration” second to last, far below factors like a “reputation for quality” and a “robust and complete API.”


Featured image credit

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *